Piracy – parodied, dismissed, or unregulated – still a sin

Shall I count the many ways I’ve heard to excuse piracy?

Prices are too high.“ 

The artist only gets like 1% of the money, anyways.“ 

Some artists tell people to copy their stuff so they can get their name out there.“ 

It’s just sharing.“ 

With the box office success of Pirates of the Caribbean, nominated for 5 Oscars, and grossing $2,673,091,461 worldwide, Disney successfully turned villains of history into entertaining quasi-heroes. In a surprising coup d’état, kidnapping, barbary, and plunder were toned down through Disneyfication. According to Disney’s franchise, to be a pirate is to be part of an ignoble and misunderstood class, men and women who have embraced their real selves, but who can, on occasion, pull up their bootstraps and save the day.

This popular Disney romanticization helps me understand how the stealing of intellectual property, “piracy,” is so prolific, among the religious and irreligious alike.  

Recently, a Christian friend of mine asked if I would like to burn his copy of Fleet Foxes. Politely, I refused and asked what album he recommend I buy, which was followed by his rote defense of why he thought it ok to rip music (I recall he used reasons #1 and #2 from above).

Some artists, including Neil Gaiman, Sigur Ros, Coldplay, and Derek Webb, give away samples of their work to entice readers and listeners for more, but it’s the difference between the owner giving and the thief taking.  

I was saddened, but not surprised, to find my Christian brother participating in intellectual theft, a vice that is overlooked (like gluttony) in the smorgasbord of pseudo-religious America. But what is common among the children of wrath ought not to be practiced among the children of God (Ephesians 2).

Some would argue that the writers of Scripture did not understand copyright law and intellectual ownership – it’s not really stealing if the person can’t see you do it, after all…a ridiculous excuse, no different than the blame-shifting that happened in the Garden. 

Piracy is just that timeless sin of covetousness, wrapped in old excuses and faulty reasoning, desiring what belongs to your neighbor without making the sacrifices to obtain it:

You must not covet your neighbor’s wife. You must not covet your neighbor’s house or land, male or female servant, ox or donkey, or anything else that belongs to your neighbor.” Deuteronomy 5:21

You may be wondering, why does Rivene rant so harshly against piracy? 

First, I am an artist. Unpublished, with vague, hopeful dreams of selling some of my stories, I sympathize with artists whose work is stolen by covetous fans.

Secondly, I think it is a sign, a billboard so to speak, announcing to the world either ignorance or stubborn blasphemy. In the words of Martin Luther, the first of the ten commandments is encapsulated with,

Thou shalt fear, love, and trust in Me as thine only true God. For where there is a heart thus disposed towards God, the same has fulfilled this and all the other commandments. On the other hand, whoever fears and loves anything else in heaven and upon earth will keep neither this nor any.

Piracy, like pornography, adultery, murder, blasphemy, and countless other sins, is the fruit of breaking the first of the ten commandments – “you must not have any other god but me.“ 

The heart behind piracy is the same heart that led our first parents to the Fall. It is a subtle twisting of words to hide the breaking of commandments, no different than modern couples that distort the biblical view of marriage.

The typical American views monogamy as an antiquated ideal, propagated by ancient stoics, men who were unable to uphold sex as pleasure without propagation. This realist understands (but certainly won’t admit) that unfaithfulness is inevitable – with separate career paths, emotionally entangling friendships, and constant pornographic visual bombardment – so rather than bending the heart to the ideal, the ideal is devoured by the world. 

Like the Apostle Paul, I would remind you dear friends, what is common among the children of wrath ought not to be practiced among the children of God. 

And so dear friends, please do not entice me to blaspheme, do not offer me your wife, and do not tempt me to steal. And as much as I am able, I will reciprocate likewise.

Published in: on November 30, 2008 at 6:34 am  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , , ,

Unfaithful Rivene

nun-shame

To those faithful readers wanting to keep up on the latest Journey posts, I have a small confession to make:

I have been unfaithful.

For some time now, I have been splitting my writing commitment between this site, and my church’s blog site.

I know, I know. I should have told you.

You probably feel hurt. Betrayed. You wonder if you will ever be able to trust me again..

What can I say? I am sorry. But I’ve decided to make things right. 

If you want to keep up on all my writing, you will have to occasionally wander over to Mars Hill: Lake City.

If you can forgive me, and want to try and make this relationship work, I would recommend my latest article: Thanksgiving is an attitude, not a day.

(And don’t worry, faithful readers, because like that childhood sweetheart with the awkward smile and the too large glasses, Rivene’s Journey is still my first love)

Published in: on November 18, 2008 at 6:32 am  Comments (3)  
Tags: ,

Theology of the Joshua Generation

holy-spirit-dove

Today, I was conducting my usual Monday morning routine – a bowl of Irish oatmeal, a short devotional, deciding how best to use my day off – when I decided to continue a new trend of reading The New Yorker’s headline article.

This week it was The Joshua Generation by David Remnick.

Overall, I found Mr. Remnick’s article to be insightful, well written, and instructive regarding the history of our new President. His storytelling prose, weaving insights from key figures in Obama’s life, was thoroughly enjoyable. The tone of the article was jubilant – “it was about damned time,” Mr. Remnick said, referring to Obama as the prophetic realization of Doctor Martin Luther King’s dream. But the article was not without a marked hint of reticence:

Yet you also heard from many people a great wariness, a kind of defense against white self-congratulation or the impression that somehow Obama’s election would automatically transform the conditions of New Orleans and the country.”

He [Obama] is a man who can be accommodated by America, but he is not my hero, because a politician, by nature, has to surrender. Where the problems that afflict African-Americans are concerned, Obama can’t go for broke. And the white people—good, decent white people—who voted for him just can’t understand. They don’t have to walk through the same misery as our children do.” – Jerome Smith, resident of New Orleans

Also, the article was not without its errors.

As much as I enjoyed Mr. Remnick’s article, I must highlight a grossly mistaken theological statement:

In his view, despair, the Biblically unforgivable sin, was at the heart of Wright’s mistake.

This statement is found on page 9 of the article, talking about Obama’s reaction to some of Reverend Wright’s statements. Biblically, despair is not the unforgivable sin. The only Biblically unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

“But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin” Mark 3:29.

What Mr. Remnick’s article does not answer is whether this is Obama’s theological misunderstanding, or a journalistic lapse.

(If someone does know, by the way, whether this is Obama’s misunderstanding, or the journalist’s, please post a comment with the answer.)

For a more accurate understanding of this “unforgivable sin,” I would highly recommend Christians and the Unpardonable Sin by Bob Wilkin.

And for a demonstration of the attitude behind this sin, I would direct you to The Blasphemy Challenge (a.k.a. “independence from the Stone Age”).

Of course, I remonstrate any readers who suggest that any particular individual in these blasphemy videos is unforgivable. Should they turn from public defiance of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and accept the forgiveness of Christ, Christ would forgive them. But I believe their current attitudes are exactly what Christ is speaking of in Mark 3:29.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.